More than two months after Providus Bank Limited and Unity Bank Plc began operating as a single entity, customers of the newly merged ProvidusUnity Bank have taken to social media to complain about difficulties using the bank’s digital banking services.
Several posts on X, formerly Twitter, reviewed by TechMedia Africa indicate that customers are experiencing delayed transfers, missing transaction alerts and problems accessing or migrating their accounts to the new banking platform.
The complaints come shortly after the completion of the merger, which brought together Providus Bank’s digital banking infrastructure and Unity Bank’s larger customer base and physical network.
In its statement announcing the commencement of operations as a unified institution, ProvidusUnity Bank said the combination would “create a stronger platform with greater capacity to support individuals, businesses and communities across Nigeria.”
But customer complaints reviewed by TechMedia Africa suggest that some users are yet to experience the stability and improved digital banking experience promised by the new bank.
The complaints customers are experiencing
The complaints, particularly on X, point to recurring difficulties rather than isolated failed transactions. Customers have reported being unable to log into the mobile app, seeing errors when attempting to access their accounts, waiting for transfers to be completed and not receiving transaction alerts.
One customer, Tuchel, said the bank’s services had deteriorated since the merger, particularly in relation to mobile banking access and transaction notifications.
Another customer reported repeated failures on the mobile application and said the problem eventually left them completely unable to sign in.
“I’ve been sending mails and trying to know why I am getting your mobile app system failures back to back. It keeps saying (Error fetching banks) and now I am completely logged out and unable to sign in. Please what’s the issue?” the customer said in a post accompanied by a screenshot of the error.
The reports suggest that the problem is not confined to customers attempting to make transfers. For some users, access to the digital banking platform itself appears to have become unreliable.
Blazingcross, another X user, attributed some of the difficulties experienced by former Unity Bank customers to what the user described as an aggressive integration of the two banks.
The user argued that the process appeared to be treating the transaction more like an acquisition than a merger, particularly because of changes affecting Unity Bank customers.
“It’s too aggressive and seems they don’t care about Unity Bank Customers at all,” the user wrote, adding that “all Unity account numbers and ATM cards have all been deactivated.”
The comments represent the view of an individual customer and do not independently establish that all Unity Bank accounts or cards have been deactivated.
When a banking failure becomes an emergency
The reported problems can have consequences beyond inconvenience, particularly when customers need access to funds for time-sensitive payments.
One X user claimed that a failed transaction affected an attempt to pay hospital bills for a daughter. According to the user, the account was debited even though the intended recipient had not received the money.
“My daughter is in the hospital and I tried paying her bills through this bank but they never credited the acct; all they could do was to debit me,” the user said, while also alleging that attempts to obtain assistance from the bank’s support team were unsuccessful.
The claim could not independently be verified by TechMedia Africa.
Such experiences highlight why reliability becomes particularly important during a banking-system migration. A customer who cannot access an account, confirm a transaction or immediately recover a failed payment may have limited alternatives when the money involved is needed urgently.
For a bank undergoing a large-scale integration, the challenge is therefore not simply moving customers from one platform to another. It is maintaining confidence that the systems holding and moving their money will continue to work while that transition takes place.
Also Check: Zenith Bank discloses cyber breach affecting customer email addresses and phone numbers
The merger increased the scale of the integration challenge
The roots of the ProvidusUnity combination go back to August 2024, when the Central Bank of Nigeria approved financial accommodation to support the proposed merger between Unity Bank and Providus Bank. The CBN said the intervention was intended to support the stability of the financial system and address Unity Bank’s obligations to the regulator and other stakeholders.
The transaction subsequently went through regulatory, shareholder and judicial processes. In June 2026, the Supreme Court dismissed a legal challenge to the merger, clearing the final major legal obstacle to the combination.
ProvidusUnity Bank then announced on June 26 that the two institutions would commence operations as a single, unified bank.
The combination created a much larger institution, bringing together Providus Bank’s technology and digital banking capabilities with Unity Bank’s broader geographic reach and established customer base.
That scale is significant because a bank merger is not simply the consolidation of branches and corporate structures. Behind the scenes, the institutions must reconcile customer records, account information, transaction histories, authentication systems, cards and digital channels.
The objective is to make those systems function as one while preserving customers’ access to their money and banking services.
That makes the digital experience one of the most visible measures of whether the integration is working.
ProvidusUnity Bank itself has continued to present digital banking as a central part of the combined institution. Its current banking platform offers customers transfers, transaction history and real-time account statements, while its transaction-notification infrastructure is designed to provide real-time alerts.
This makes reports of customers being unable to log in, experiencing transfer delays or missing transaction notifications particularly important.
The bank had also told customers at the start of the unified operation to expect stability and an improved experience as integration activities continued.
For customers, however, the technical demands of combining two banks do not alter the basic expectations of digital banking. An account must remain accessible, transfers should be processed within the expected timeframe, and customers should be able to establish what happened to their money when a transaction is completed or fails.
That expectation becomes more important as the institution assumes responsibility for a much larger customer base.
The merger was designed to create a stronger and more nationally scaled bank. But the immediate test for ProvidusUnity Bank is whether it can translate that larger scale into a stable customer experience while completing the integration of the systems inherited from both institutions.
ProvidusUnity Bank has not publicly addressed the full range of complaints reviewed for this report.
Until the reported problems around app access, transfers and transaction notifications are resolved, the success of the merger will be measured not only by the size of the new institution, its assets or its branch network, but by whether millions of customers can reliably access and move their money.
“For our customers, our commitment remains unchanged — to deliver excellent service with greater scale and broader access. Customers should expect stability and improved experience as integration activities continue,” the bank said at the time.